Protecting The Reputation Of Public Relations

What can be done to repair PR’s perception problem?
shattered self-portrait

Several times over the past couple of weeks, I’ve been asked the simple question: “What kind of work do you do?”

“I’m in public relations,” I respond.

Their responses often demonstrate a deep misunderstanding of the PR industry. During notable instances, there was a brief pause of silence followed by something along the lines of:

  • “Oh, you mean the people who try to get people to buy things they don’t need.”
  • “Wow! [condescending stare] So um… the guys who help manipulate people?”
  • “So the guys who help corporations lie?”

I’ve found it very clear that the PR industry itself has a PR problem. Indeed, these negative associations are calcified by the derogatory and incorrect journalistic term for PR as “The Dark Side,” PR pros as “spin doctors,” and by the dishonesty of some PR campaigns in the media spotlight as of late.

This perception doesn’t merely lie outside of the PR industry, either; it’s begun to poison the beliefs of PR students themselves as well. PR Daily points out that some PR students believe they are “supposed to lie” — a tragedy to the future integrity of the industry, and one that flies directly in the face of the PRSA’s code of ethics and those of most PR firms. Thankfully, September is PR Ethics Month, and PRSA and others are undergoing initiatives to correct those false notions.

Not Unique

Danny Brown, partner at Bonsai Interactive Marketing, argued that every industry has this problem — from marketing to lifeguarding — and that the problem lies with individuals, not inherently with the industry. The most dishonest and unethical PR campaigns are no more common than the Ponzi Scheme or Cayman Island tax evasion of financial investing, or the journalism phone hacking that’s been making the news recently.

As I noted in my previous article about the representation of Islam, entities often become naturally represented by the most extreme instances within them. Glenn Ferrell put it brilliantly when he said:

“We humans do lousy induction. It’s in our nature to collect these highly negative outliers and then construct generalizations that hurt entire industries.”

Thus, it comes as no surprise that the PR industry itself faces the tough task of bringing attention to its larger, brighter side.

Vulnerability

Plato is famous for promoting journalism’s ideal of one definitive Truth. However, PR acknowledges the idea that the Truth ideal often has many perspectives- an idea that some see as ethically dubious.

I believe that PR has an additional layer of vulnerability because it tends to reject the Journalistic ideal of objective truth. In other words, PR exists on the premise that there are multiple perspectives of looking at an issue, and seeks to make sure that the perspective of the client is given the attention it deserves. Those who firmly believe in the objectivity ideal may interpret some aspects of PR as manipulation, while PR pros and their clients simply see it as representation.

And after all, if there’s the right to a fair trial in the courtroom, should that not extend to fair representation in the eyes of a judging public?

The Tip Of The Iceberg

I’ve come to notice that people are vastly unaware that PR is about more than simple representation. They don’t realize that beneath the representative surface, much of the work involves building relationships and — to the delightful surprise of many — increasing transparency.

Solutions

As a solution to this problem, Gini Dietrich of PR blog Spin Sucks has proposed that individuals should promote the measurable business value of PR. This solution is exceedingly necessary for perception towards clients and CEOs (and with the growing toolkit of analytical tools, it’s becoming more feasible than ever before). However, to the general public who remain some of PR’s strongest critics, a different aspect must be emphasized.

Because people lack awareness of the industry’s more dominant, positive side, PR professionals must always be ready to articulate what PR is actually all about. When the critics that I talked about at the beginning of the article made those comments, I took the opportunity to make sure they were aware of the following points (albeit in a very friendly, conversational manner):

  • A large part of PR is about building relationships: between business to business, business and consumer, and between clients and media.
  • Much of the work of PR firms involves helping social causes, non-profits, and educating the general public on things important to their health and lifestyle.
  • In today’s information-rich world where everyone is their own investigator and publisher, increasing transparency is absolutely fundamental.

Sometimes I’ll put the industry in context with an open-ended question or hypothetical anecdote:

  • Say a new business, non-profit or social campaign opens up, or an established business develops a new product, changes CEOs, or acquires a new company. How do they communicate all of this to their audience?
  • Say that one employee does something irresponsible, and the company faces a disproportionate (and often undeserved) consumer backlash because of it. How does the company tell its side of the story?

To my pleasure, their response has always been positive and supportive. The biggest takeaway here is that far too many people have no idea what PR is all about. In order for this to change, PR pros and students at all levels must have an understanding of PR’s deeper role in society, and be able to articulate it accordingly. It’s up to us as PR representatives to treat the industry as we would our own client, and give it the representation that it deserves. By making sure that people understand the true colors of PR, we can ensure that the “Dark Side” label goes back to where it came from.

What other ways are there to protect the reputation of the PR industry?

Please debate, supplement and respond to this article by commenting below.

For more articles on repairing and protecting PR’s reputation, Spin Sucks is a fantastic resource.

Links in this Article

  1. Uh-oh, some PR students think they’re ‘supposed to lie’ – PR Daily – By Dario Bernardini
  2. PRSA Code Of Ethics
  3. PRSA Ethics Month Activities
  4. Danny Brown on Twitter
  5. You Know What’s Wrong With The PR Industry? – Danny Brown
  6. Ponzi Scheme – Wikipedia
  7. “Tax Me If You Can” – Haven Or Havoc – PBS Frontline
  8. News International Phone Hacking Scandal – Wikipedia
  9. Where Are The Moderate Voices? The PR of Islam – Flames On Fifth Avenue – By Eric Wittke
  10. Glenn Ferrell on Twitter
  11. Seven Ways to Change the Perception of PR – Spin Sucks – By Glenn Ferrell
  12. Objectivity (journalism) – Wikipedia
  13. World News From Every Angle: Mondokio – By Brady Calestro
  14. Right to a fair trial – Wikipedia
  15. Perp walk – Wikipedia
  16. Gini Dietrich on Twitter
  17. Spin Sucks
  18. The Communication Industry Has a Perception Issue – Spin Sucks – By Gini Dietrich
  19. Dark Side (Star Wars) – Wikipedia

Did you enjoy this article?

About the Author:

Eric Wittke is a public relations guy in Chicago who enjoys painting, sailing, reading and longboarding in his free time. He has a penchant for what makes us tick. Eric founded Flames On Fifth Avenue as a place to discuss and exchange ideas on how to push the limits of modern public relations.
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
TheWaterFrontKey 5 pts

I am really lucky that I have found the post you have here for us..

tessmac 11 pts

very interesting article. you made a lot of great points.

My latest conversation: C Turner Solicitors

evelynonline80 10 pts

Great article, planning public relations response and embedding it within crisis management plans shouldn’t take that long or require too great an investment of resources. Failure to do so could result in reputational collapse and business failure. It’s not a risk worth taking.

My latest conversation: Battery Charger Review

ewittke 6 pts moderator

evelynonline80 Great thoughts, Evelyn. Better safe than sorry!

My latest conversation: Broadcast, Meet Your New Friend: Conversation

PeterFaur 11 pts

I just wrote about this today. My feeling is that, because public relations is often involved in controversy, the field will always be controversial. It comes with the territory, and it's not the end of the world! Here's a link: http://su.pr/2Y3X2T

My latest conversation: The power of yes or no

ewittke 6 pts moderator

PeterFaur GREAT point. Seems like the same would apply to lawyers -- I rarely hear people supportive of lawyers, until they need one themselves.

ginidietrich 10356 pts

THIS KILLS ME! The problem with the perception of our industry is we don't know how to explain it. And it's not tangible so people don't understand it. Crap. Now I'm all fired up.

Without giving it away, I talk about this on Spin Sucks tomorrow. There is a local Chicago company that is doing a great, big PR stunt that, from where I sit, makes zero sense from a business perspective. So much so that I uttered the words, "Hello company name? 1980 called and wants their PR stunt back."

We have to, have to, have to show our worth in terms of dollars and cents. The pundits who talk about awareness and impressions and sentiment have clearly never run a P&L. It makes me nuts. I run two businesses. If one of my peeps came to me and said, "We have to keep this program going because it's creating positive sentiment, I would laugh them out of the room."

But this happens all the time.

Grrrrr. Now I have to write a blog post about this.

One more thing...THANK YOU for the P.S. That was really, really nice of you.

My latest conversation: Operation Name Drop: A New Communication Method

JGoldsborough 256 pts

ginidietrich I kid you not, I just had a fellow PR pro ask me the other day: "Where's the strategy? I mean big idea? I mean stunt?" Well, they didn't say stunt. But they might as well have. There's the spin issue we need to solve. But then there's the bigger issue of "hey your work is nice and all and you really know how to execute, but if I want fluff I'll go to the store and buy marshmallows for my smores" issue. We as PR pros need to tackle both.

I'm with ewittke . I think we need a PR campaign for our industry. I'm not kidding either. Let's make it happen.

My latest conversation: Sometimes "following the rules" just doesn't make sense

ewittke 6 pts moderator

We truly do. What do you think would be a good way of going about it?

I'm craving a campfire and some s'mores now. JGoldsborough ginidietrich

JGoldsborough 256 pts

ewittkeginidietrich Continuing to cover the topic in blog posts is a good start. But let's not take the PR campaign for PR off the table.

My latest conversation: 10 signs you might be hurting the PR industry

ewittke 6 pts moderator

Nailed it!

I'll be watching your site like a hawk -- can't wait to hear your thoughts. And it was my pleasure. :) ginidietrich

ewittke 6 pts moderator

That's hilarious -- follow the blog chain :) Very interesting article on Arrington. And thank you for your kind words!

Regarding objective truth: would you like to do a guest post on the topic in the future?

glenn_ferrell 85 pts

ewittke Ha ! I'll think on it. It's so much easier (and probably more important) to talk about what a "lie" is than what the "truth" is. When talking about the "truth" the trick is how not to get bogged down in philosophy... But thanks much for the invite :)

ewittke 6 pts moderator

glenn_ferrell You're very right -- and I've always had a deep admiration for writers can write abstractly without getting bogged down in philosophy. It definitely takes some special combination of skill and wisdom.

Your ideas here are very intriguing... :)

glenn_ferrell 85 pts

Nice article Eric -- I would love to do a long winded comment on "objective truth" and PR but I'll save that one for a particularly boring day :)

You know the original @DannyBrown article that triggered the @ginidietrich that, in turn, triggered my article on this whole subject, was itself triggered (are you following all this ?) by a scathing attack on PR ethics by Michael Arrington. Well Arrington's ethics are now being dragged into the light also : bit.ly/olHVmA

Conversation from Twitter

TroyEdwards
TroyEdwards @TroyEdwards 13 Sep

ginidietrich Did you just drop a Tony the Tiger growl on me? What's up?

seanmcginnis
seanmcginnis @seanmcginnis 13 Sep

ginidietrich You're always all fired up about something..... The interwebz wouldn't be the same if you weren't.... LOL!

seanmcginnis
seanmcginnis @seanmcginnis 13 Sep

ginidietrich Probably one of the main drivers of my fanboi credentials. I'd be bored without you around stirring the pot.... ;)

ginidietrich
ginidietrich @ginidietrich 13 Sep

seanmcginnis I need to find an enemy post. I haven't had one since the one that shall not be named

ginidietrich
ginidietrich @ginidietrich 12 Sep

ewittke I owe you a blog comment or two!

ewittke
ewittke @ewittke 12 Sep

ginidietrich Hah! No you don't, just keep doing what you're doing. :) we need it!

ginidietrich
ginidietrich @ginidietrich 12 Sep

ewittke Well thanks! But I'll come by for a visit for sure.